<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F8 and that Telegraph road</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/</link>
	<description>occasional thoughts by john borthwick</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: scale model trucks</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-140555</link>
		<dc:creator>scale model trucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-140555</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;scale model trucks...&lt;/strong&gt;

Do you have a newsletter to sign up to?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>scale model trucks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Do you have a newsletter to sign up to?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THINK / Musings :: web 2.0 &#38; making money</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-112458</link>
		<dc:creator>THINK / Musings :: web 2.0 &#38; making money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-112458</guid>
		<description>[...] to&#160; provide a platform to build a business. &#160;&#160; A year ago this week I drafted an essay on why I believed the Facebook platform needed to offer Web 2.0 applications more than just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to&nbsp; provide a platform to build a business. &nbsp;&nbsp; A year ago this week I drafted an essay on why I believed the Facebook platform needed to offer Web 2.0 applications more than just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THINK / Musings / Facebook Beacon: Not what I signed up for</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-42117</link>
		<dc:creator>THINK / Musings / Facebook Beacon: Not what I signed up for</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-42117</guid>
		<description>[...] revenue stream. Digital assets sales didn&#8217;t take off. Then came F8. F8 and the platform initiative has been a huge boon to web 2.0 companies looking for distribution &#8212; but as yet, it is not a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] revenue stream. Digital assets sales didn&#8217;t take off. Then came F8. F8 and the platform initiative has been a huge boon to web 2.0 companies looking for distribution &#8212; but as yet, it is not a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weissman</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-10565</link>
		<dc:creator>Weissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-10565</guid>
		<description>Right on John.  This is all about distribution, and is such is likely a great business move.  But as we lived at AOL, while that might maximize short term usage and even revenues, the closed system, with sub-part interface and presentation layer, flies in the face of openness and  web innovation.

I'm particularly interested in the presentation layer aspect to it.  The FB layer for these new apps seems quite lacking, in screen space and potential functionality.  Is that a path for user adoption of great applications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on John.  This is all about distribution, and is such is likely a great business move.  But as we lived at AOL, while that might maximize short term usage and even revenues, the closed system, with sub-part interface and presentation layer, flies in the face of openness and  web innovation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m particularly interested in the presentation layer aspect to it.  The FB layer for these new apps seems quite lacking, in screen space and potential functionality.  Is that a path for user adoption of great applications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-10320</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/30/f8-and-that-telegraph-road/#comment-10320</guid>
		<description>Urg, someone just sent me this, Facebook guidelines for F8 partners, ugly:

http://www.valleywag.com/tech/facebook/do-what-we-tell-you-not-what-we-say-to-the-press-264534.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urg, someone just sent me this, Facebook guidelines for F8 partners, ugly:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valleywag.com/tech/facebook/do-what-we-tell-you-not-what-we-say-to-the-press-264534.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.valleywag.com/tech/facebook/do-what-we-tell-you-not-what-we-say-to-the-press-264534.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
