<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hybrid waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/</link>
	<description>occasional thoughts by john borthwick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stathis</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-19668</link>
		<dc:creator>Stathis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-19668</guid>
		<description>Nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>Agree, the 16:9 720p looks very good -- from a device that is just a little thicker than a video ipod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, the 16:9 720p looks very good &#8212; from a device that is just a little thicker than a video ipod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-7774</guid>
		<description>Hi there.  Since I just picked up a new Canon TX1, I&#039;ve been following the blogs to see other users&#039; experiences and advice.  

Regarding the mjpeg compression, I thought I&#039;d toss in the advantage of the format: it&#039;s extremely high quality.  The smaller file sizes of mpeg4 and others comes at the cost of the details lost in the codecs&#039; compression.  

Leaving aside the enormous file size it produces, I&#039;ve been really impressed with the quality of what the camera and mjpeg format in good light (in low light the camera&#039;s small chip clearly struggles and produces grain).  

I do wish Canon had also offered an mpeg4 additional option, perhaps calling it a &quot;Super LP&quot; option for the HD mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.  Since I just picked up a new Canon TX1, I&#8217;ve been following the blogs to see other users&#8217; experiences and advice.  </p>
<p>Regarding the mjpeg compression, I thought I&#8217;d toss in the advantage of the format: it&#8217;s extremely high quality.  The smaller file sizes of mpeg4 and others comes at the cost of the details lost in the codecs&#8217; compression.  </p>
<p>Leaving aside the enormous file size it produces, I&#8217;ve been really impressed with the quality of what the camera and mjpeg format in good light (in low light the camera&#8217;s small chip clearly struggles and produces grain).  </p>
<p>I do wish Canon had also offered an mpeg4 additional option, perhaps calling it a &#8220;Super LP&#8221; option for the HD mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

