<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hybrid waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/</link>
	<description>occasional thoughts by john borthwick</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stathis</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-19668</link>
		<dc:creator>Stathis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-19668</guid>
		<description>Nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>Agree, the 16:9 720p looks very good -- from a device that is just a little thicker than a video ipod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, the 16:9 720p looks very good &#8212; from a device that is just a little thicker than a video ipod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2007/05/06/hybrid-waste/#comment-7774</guid>
		<description>Hi there.  Since I just picked up a new Canon TX1, I've been following the blogs to see other users' experiences and advice.  

Regarding the mjpeg compression, I thought I'd toss in the advantage of the format: it's extremely high quality.  The smaller file sizes of mpeg4 and others comes at the cost of the details lost in the codecs' compression.  

Leaving aside the enormous file size it produces, I've been really impressed with the quality of what the camera and mjpeg format in good light (in low light the camera's small chip clearly struggles and produces grain).  

I do wish Canon had also offered an mpeg4 additional option, perhaps calling it a "Super LP" option for the HD mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.  Since I just picked up a new Canon TX1, I&#8217;ve been following the blogs to see other users&#8217; experiences and advice.  </p>
<p>Regarding the mjpeg compression, I thought I&#8217;d toss in the advantage of the format: it&#8217;s extremely high quality.  The smaller file sizes of mpeg4 and others comes at the cost of the details lost in the codecs&#8217; compression.  </p>
<p>Leaving aside the enormous file size it produces, I&#8217;ve been really impressed with the quality of what the camera and mjpeg format in good light (in low light the camera&#8217;s small chip clearly struggles and produces grain).  </p>
<p>I do wish Canon had also offered an mpeg4 additional option, perhaps calling it a &#8220;Super LP&#8221; option for the HD mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
